Focus Topics,
Facilitators and Faculty Members
Assessing Student Learning: Dixie McGinty, Educational Leadership
& Foundations
The "A" word need not evoke thoughts of "outcomes
data" and accreditation reports. In a different sense,"assessment"
simply refers to the various ways in which we, as individual
instructors, evaluate the performance of students in our courses.
Participants in this group are invited to raise and critically
examine difficult issues—philosophical, logistical,
or pedagogical—related to the assessment of student
learning. As a result of these discussions, participants identify
assessment-related challenges in their own courses, and develop
their own projects (e.g., designing an alternative assessment)
to address those challenges. Individual projects are shared
with and critiqued by the members of the group as they are
developed. The goal is to finish the Institute with a "product"
that is both applicable in a particular course and grounded
in the participant's own philosophy of assessment.
Team members: Hollye Moss (Management), Irene Mueller (Health
Sciences), Julie Barnes (Mathematics/Computer Science), JoAnne
Hopper-Stilley (Marketing), Lydia Aydlett (Psychology), Rachel
York-Bridgers (English), Lisen Roberts (Human Services), Sarah
York (English), Liz Simmons-Rowland (Nursing)
Best Practices in Teaching an On-Line Course: Linda Venturo,
Instructional Technology Consultant, ITS, and part-time instructor,
Online Criminal Justice
Program Participants address the following questions that
are central to the processes of developing and teaching online:
- Why should I consider delivering my resident course partially
or totally online?
- What are the advantages and disadvantages of teaching
in an online environment?
- What are some best practices for online teaching that
I can readily use with my
resident course material?
- How can I start preparing to teach on line?
Team members: Christine Stevens (Health Sciences), Dale Brotherton
(Human Services/Counseling),Gary Jones (BCIS/Economics), Karen
Lunnen (Physical Therapy), Tracy Zontek (Health Sciences), Valerie
Matthiesen (Nursing), Lisa Briggs (Criminal Justice), Sharon
Jacques (Nursing)
Reading ,Writing and Learning: Marsha Lee Baker, English
Reading
is not just a way to find out what to learn, nor is writing
merely a demonstration of what has been learned. Reading and
writing are methods for how to learn. Participants explore
ways to facilitate learning, including annotation techniques,
double-entry notebooks, and approaches for writing-like-a-reader
and
reading-like-a-writer. Help students learn how people in a
discipline write and read, and, in turn, students will learn
the discipline itself (even those students who claim they
“don’t read” or “can’t write”).
Team members: Eliza Dean (B-K & Elementary Education),
Glenna Straeffer (English), John Slater (Communication &
Theatre Arts), Bill McClendon (Business Law), Katherine Cipriano
(English)
Cooperative Learning: Valorie Nybo, Health and Human Services
Participants focus on the basic characteristics of cooperative
learning, including creating a class setting in which students
perceive cooperative learning activities to be safe and productive
and converting lectures and “non-cooperative”
activities to cooperative activities. Participants are encouraged
to consider individual and/or whole-class activities they
currently use in teaching and explore ways to make these activities
cooperative. The goal is to develop a collection of cooperative
activities that is both applicable in a particular course
and grounded in the principles of cooperative learning.
Team members: Bill Papin (Health and Human Performance),
Jane Eastman (Anthropology & Sociology), Kathy Starr (Physical
Therapy), Lee Rayburn (Associate CIO)
Creating Your First Year Seminar: Brian Railsback, English
Participants complete a syllabus for a fall First Year Seminar.
We begin by discussing the Liberal Studies goals for the First
Year Seminar and experiences participants have had with first
year students at WCU. We work through the syllabus from general
policies and assignments down to the week-by-week schedule.
Ideally, we have a mix of participants from a variety of disciplines
who have taught First Year Seminar and those faculty members
who will be trying it for the first time. Faculty members
who are not teaching First Year Seminar soon, but who may
teach the seminar some day also are welcome.
Team members: Carroll Brown (Hospitality & Tourism),
Mae Claxton (English), Mary Ellen Griffin (Psychology), Vera
Holland Guise (Political Science), Richard Boyer (English),
Mark Couture (Modern Foreign Languages)
The emphasis of each of these focus teams was
on application - on how you can use what you’ve learned
in one or more of your courses. Each team’s work was
intensive, hands-on and interdisciplinary.

|