|
Research
Involving Recombinant DNA Molecules
WCU faculty, staff,
or students involved in Recombinant DNA (r-DNA) molecules research
are required to follow established guidelines issued by the National
Institutes of Health (NIH). The Guidelines for Research Involving
Recombinant DNA Molecules have been published in the Federal Register
(May 7, 1986, plus recent amendments). Copies of the documents can
be obtained from the Office of Research and Graduate Studies.
The Guidelines
define recombinant DNA molecules as either (1) molecules which are
constructed outside living cells by joining natural or synthetic DNA
segments to DNA molecules that can replicate in a living cell or (2)
DNA molecules that result from
the replication of those described in (1).
All research at
WCU that involves r-DNA must be registered with and approved by the
Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBC) as reviewed in accordance
with the section entitled "Procedures for Review of Research"
which follows. Where differences between the NIH Guidelines and this
policy exist, WCU's policy will be the controlling guide.
NIH categorizes
experiments which involve r-DNA into four classes (1 to 4). Currently,
WCU's Laboratory Safety Manual states, "There are no facilities
on campus for work with dangerous class 3 or 4 viruses so work involving
these agents is prohibited." Any faculty anticipating use of
either class 3 or 4 agents should contact both the Associate Dean
of Research and Graduate Studies and WCU's Safety Officer to discuss
such experiments well in advance of research initiation.
Institutional
Biosafety Committee
Upon the recommendation
of the Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs, the Chancellor will appoint
and provide training for an Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBC)
that ensures that r-DNA research is carried out in full conformity
with the NIH Guidelines. Membership on the IBC will be constituted
as outlined by the Guidelines and the IBC shall report directly to
the Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs. The IBC has the authority
to recommend policy and procedure changes related to this research
activity.
A chairperson
will be selected by the VCAA. Committee members are appointed for
a term of three years and may be reappointed to additional three-year
terms without limitation.
Procedures
for Review of Research
Principal investigators
(PI) of any on-campus research or proposals for off-campus r-DNA research
funding must submit a Memorandum of Understanding and Agreement (MUA)
to the Chairperson of the IBC prior to initiation of the study. Copies
of these forms can be obtained from the Office of Research and Graduate
Studies. The MUA should be sent to Chairperson, IBC, in care of Associate
Dean of the Graduate School. Upon receipt of the MUA the Chairperson
shall send copies to all committee members and convene an IBC meeting.
A quorum, a majority of the committee members, must be present and
the final recommendation made by the majority of the quorum.
No member of the
IBC may participate in the review of an application in which the committee
member has a conflicting interest, except to provide information if
requested. Specialists may be invited to meetings to assist in review
of issues beyond or in addition to the expertise available to the
IBC.
For approved multi-year
projects, the PI will be required to submit an annual update as requested
by the IBC.
Appeals of
IBC Actions
The IBC has the
authority not to approve a research proposal (MUA) and to suspend
or terminate research that is not being conducted in accordance with
IBC requirements. Any proposal (MUA) not approved by the IBC shall
be returned to the PI with reasons for disapproval. The PI may either
modify the MUA and resubmit it in accordance with IBC comments or
appeal the decision. Any suspension or termination of approved research
shall include a statement of the reasons and be reported promptly
to the investigator, appropriate institutional officials, and the
funding agency.
The PI may appeal
a decision that leads to disapproval of an MUA or a suspension or
termination of research by sending a letter requesting a meeting of
the IBC to the VCAA within ten (10) working days of the receipt of
the decision. The VCAA shall request that the Chairperson reconvene
the IBC in a timely fashion to consider any additional information
from the PI. The hearing will allow relevant discussion, documentation,
and witnesses on behalf of the investigator. Based upon the information
presented, the IBC may vote to sustain or change its original recommendation.
Should the IBC
determine that either unethical behavior or misconduct in research
has occurred, the Chairperson will initiate action as outlined in
WCU's Policy on Ethics in Research.
Formerly Executive
Memorandum 94-107
Initially approved August 15, 1994
Administering office: Research and Graduate Studies
Posted
June 08, 1999
|