Office of the Chancellor at Western Carolina University
Home | Western Home | Prospective Students | Current Students | Faculty & Staff | Alumni
 
 
 
Updates and Speeches
 
Committees and Task Forces Appointed by Chancellor
 
Professorships
 
Speaker Series
 
University Awards
 
University Policies
 

Board of Trustees

 
Chancellor's Division
 

Administrative Divisions

 
 

Chancellor's Update

 

September 30, 2004

We have reached the magic “freeze date” for enrollment this semester, so I thought you might be interested in knowing a bit about where we ended up. Additionally, because of the timing of the budget process, some information has only now become available regarding the impact of increased enrollment on many areas of the University. This first Chancellor’s Update will cover these two issues.

Current Enrollment and Expectations for Next Year
This is an excellent year for enrollment at Western—possibly the best overall enrollment picture in our history. As you may recall, the Board of Governors had approved an enrollment target of 8,260 for Western this semester. Our actual enrollment is 8,396. The freshman class includes 1,578 students with an average SAT of 1027, up four points over last year and 67 points since we began raising admissions standards. For the first time in the history of the University, the average SAT is above the national average. Additionally, the average high school GPA increased from 3.25 to 3.3.

The largest single source of new freshmen is Mecklenburg County , followed by Wake, Forsyth, and Buncombe. Only eight percent of freshmen reside out-of-state; this represents an area of potential growth for the University.

Overall enrollment grew by approximately 11 percent, up from 7,561 last year. More importantly, the number of credit hours taken by students increased significantly. As many of you may recall, our expected increase in funding for each succeeding year is based on the net increase in credit hours generated rather than FTE or the actual number of students. Even with the addition of 52 faculty positions this year, our actual enrollment generated more faculty positions than we had requested and funded. We anticipate, therefore, that next year’s enrollment will result in an infusion of additional new positions.

The greatest gains in enrollment were in distance education and in the undergraduate program. We were up in all important categories of undergraduate students: new freshmen, transfers, and continuing students. New resident credit graduate student enrollment did not achieve its targets and, as a result, we were slightly under-enrolled at the graduate level compared to our overall target. Undergraduate enrollment was greatly strengthened by the 74.0 percent freshman retention rate, representing a five percent increase over last year. This alone resulted in 75 additional students in Fall 2004. Congratulations to everyone who contributed to improving this very important indicator! I especially want to thank Fred Hinson, Allen Lomax, and Keith Corzine and their staffs for all of their very hard work in implementing our retention model.

Based on our current best estimates, we see the possibility of as many as 9,000 to 9,100 students enrolling in Western next fall. This level of enrollment represents another milestone for the University, and it has some implications for how we allocate space and offer classes.

Those of you who were here in 1999 may recall that Eva Klein and Associates conducted a state-wide study of the capital needs of the university system. This study resulted in the 2000 bond issue that has played a very important role in developing the physical plant of the University. The results of that study, which were approved both by the Board of Governors and the Legislature, made certain assumptions regarding the growth rates and size of the universities. Our plan was based on an estimated enrollment of 9,400 students by 2010. Subsequent to the Klein study, the Board of Governors assigned a higher expected enrollment to Western of 10,500 students by 2012. At anything near the current rate of growth, we could well achieve the original estimated level of enrollment by 2006 and the higher target by 2008.

Given the significantly improved reputation of the University, the quality of academic programs you have created, new programs that are in the planning and approval phases, and improvements in campus life for students, there is no reason to believe that Western’s enrollment will not continue to grow for the foreseeable future. Moreover, because of the rapid increase in Hispanic students, as well as continuing general in-migration, demographic projections are showing continued increases in the number of high school graduates in North Carolina for many years to come. Locally, we are seeing a significant shift in the interest people have in living in the mountains of North Carolina . Ten years ago, those of us who lived here understood the quality of life this region allowed; now southwestern North Carolina is beginning to be seen as “cool” and something of an “in” place. This can be expected to add to the interest students have in attending Western.

Based on what we believe are longer-term trends, we can expect to grow faculty and staff by a very large percentage over the next three to four years. It is possible, for example, that we could see an additional 100 faculty positions (in addition to the 52 added this year) over the next few years if the growth of the University continues. This creates something of a “space crunch,” and the Executive Council and I are beginning to lay out alternative scenarios to handle the situation:

  •  We will continue to increase admissions standards to assure that the  students accepted as traditional undergraduates are able to achieve  high levels of performance.
  •  We are exploring the possibility of completing another privatized  residence hall by next fall to house an additional 250 students.
  •  We will open the master plan for significant revisions as soon as we  complete our major property acquisitions. This will allow us to create a  flexible plan that can accommodate more students and faculty.
  •  We are exploring the possibility of seeking funding for a faculty office  building to house the growing number of faculty. Analysis of our current  buildings shows that we are not going to see an immediate shortage of  classroom space, but faculty office space will become a premium in the  near future.
  •  We will seek full funding for the School of Health and Gerontological  Sciences building since that major new facility will alleviate some of our  most overcrowded conditions.
  •  We will work closely with the Office of the President and the Board of  Governors to seek funding for a new College of Education and Allied  Professions building to allow this college to enhance significantly its  ability to produce teachers. We also will seek funding to fully renovate  Killian to allow expansion of such departments as English and  Communications.
  •  We will encourage the development of off-campus teaching centers in  surrounding counties to reduce the pressure on the Cullowhee campus.  We have been approached by leaders in Hickory , Rutherfordton,  Hendersonville , and Andrews with requests to expand our presence in  those communities. We have begun working closely with Haywood  Community College and are offering courses on that campus; our  presence there can be expanded. We also need to examine the  possibility of a teaching-oriented center in Macon County.
  •  Various forms of distance education will become increasingly important,  and they can help relieve pressure on our main campus facilities. We will  need to plan for expanded support for distance education, and we will  need to make additional investments in our distance education facilities  and technologies.

It appears that we will see over time a significant increase in the number of traditional students in Cullowhee and a significant increase in the number of older adult students in teaching locations around the region. These trends will affect many departments, and I hope that each department is examining how these trends will affect your programs.

Staff Positions and Compensation
At the time of the opening faculty meeting we were in the process of distributing the budget to the divisions. As you may be aware, the Board of Governors’ budgeting process provides guidance on the number of faculty positions, but not on the number of staff positions. You should be aware that the divisions chose to create an additional 41 SPA and EPA non-faculty positions.

Because of budget cuts that the University sustained over the last three years, we were forced to eliminate many unfilled staff positions and to delay hiring replacement staff even where the position could be filled. Many staff members, therefore, have been experiencing an increased workload with very little improvement in their compensation. This is always a difficult situation, but it has been made even more difficult by the fact that we were able to obtain local tuition funding to improve the salaries of faculty and non-faculty EPA employees, but we were prohibited from using this same source of funds to support SPA employee salaries.

It should be mentioned that from 1997 through 1999, Western used a very high percentage of its salary reserves (more than $400 thousand) to improve staff pay at a time when no such funds were available to provide additional compensation to faculty members. The remainder of the salary reserve funds was used to reduce the burden of several years of budget cuts for the rest of the University; consequently that source of funds is depleted, and it has not yet had time to be restored. Continued enrollment growth over the next several years should assist in restoring some of those funds.

All of us are concerned with the compensation levels of our hard-working staff. It seems to be a particularly onerous problem since we have been given opportunities to improve the compensation of our faculty. Clearly, the University cannot function without our hard-working, loyal staff members. So, it is important that as we grow enrollment we try to assist these loyal employees as well.

This is a particularly difficult issue because SPA employees are governed by the state-wide Personnel Act while faculty and non-faculty EPA employees are not covered by that act. SPA employee compensation levels and rules are set by state government, and we have no control over these processes. This severely limits what we can do to improve the compensation for SPA employees. However, after consulting with the Staff Forum, it is clear that we need to take several actions which are available to us, and we will work together to assure that our employees receive all compensation the state allows. We will begin with several actions:

1. Four new positions will not be filled using state funds. Two of these positions will be eliminated and two police positions will be filled using specific grant funds. This will create a pool of approximately $125,000 that can be used this year for in-range adjustments for SPA employees, as well as provide some funds for promotions. This reduces the actual number of new staff positions created this year to 39.

2. I have asked Chuck Wooten and Kathy Wong to work with the Staff Forum to conduct a study of SPA employee compensation with the goal of moving our SPA employees’ average wage to the UNC System average.

3. Assuming enrollment growth continues, a portion of new funding will be set aside for SPA employee in-range salary adjustments. I will seek the advice of the Staff Forum on what proportions of funding should be set aside for new positions and what proportion to improve compensation through legal adjustments in pay.

4. I will request that Keith Ashe, chair of the Staff Forum, join me in meetings with our local legislators to help them understand more fully the compensation needs of all our employees.

I hope you find this discussion useful and that you are having a great start to your semester. Have a great year!

 

 

 

 
Copyright © 2005 Western Carolina University