If the inventor believes that the invention was made outside the general scope of the inventor’s university duties, and if he/she does not choose to assign the rights in the invention to the university, he/she shall, in his/her invention disclosure, request that the university patent committee determine the respective rights of the university and the inventor in the invention, and shall also include in his/her disclosure information on the following points:

1. The circumstances under which the invention was made and developed;
2. The employee’s official duties at the time of the making of the invention;
3. Whether he or she requests waiver or release of any university claims or acknowledgment that the university has no claim;
4. Whether he or she wishes a patent application to be prosecuted by the university, if it should be determined that an assignment of the invention to the university is not required under the Patent and Copyright Policies; and
5. The extent to which he or she would be willing voluntarily to assign domestic and foreign rights in the invention to the university if it should be determined that an assignment of the invention to the university is not required under the Patent and Copyright Policies.